For those who don't keep up too often with THE LOS ANGELES TIMES, Geoff Boucher is the designated chronicler of all things Fanboy-friendly.
So, here's an excerpt from his talk with filmmaker Tim Burton on what looks to be Burton's Barnabas-meets-BEETLEJUICE take on Dan Curtis' gothic DARK SHADOWS (a durable property which became a daytime soap from 1966-71, two theatrical films in 71-72 and a short-lived prime-time series in 1991).
Boucher and Burton discuss the appeal of the daytime version. Let's join Burton here--highlighting and bracket comments by me:
"It's a different animal," Burton said. "If I go back and watch something like STAR TREK, it's not that hard
to analyze what the appeal was, and even if the show is dated you identify what it was that made it work. The DARK SHADOWS appeal was a little more abstract. What I loved about it was the fact that it was a melodramatic soap opera, and, well, that flies in the face of any modern studio's interests as far as moviemaking [unless it's a recently-generated source of material such as the TWILIGHT books/films]. But what we've gone for is a mixture, and that's always what I've been interested in. I think most of my movies are mixtures of light and dark and serious things and things that have humor in them. [what Burton is really saying is that old, unfamiliar TV series now get greenlighted as movies if they're played for laughs a la 21 JUMP STREET--but not in their original form]."
Entries about current events, arts and entertainment (including the competitive sport of poetry).
Showing posts with label Geoff Boucher. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Geoff Boucher. Show all posts
Monday, March 26, 2012
Friday, January 30, 2009
Geoff Boucher's stupid LA TIMES article on Paul McCartney at Coachella.
Don't ask me how Geoff Boucher's dumb, condescending "is Paul McCartney hip enough for the Coachella music festival" article made the below-the-fold on the front page of today's print edition of THE LOS ANGELES TIMES.
But, in case you haven't read it, here it is: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/music_blog/2009/01/paul-mccartney.html#comments
For some balance, here's Ann Powers' take:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/music_blog/2009/01/if-you-need-pro.html
But, in case you haven't read it, here it is: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/music_blog/2009/01/paul-mccartney.html#comments
For some balance, here's Ann Powers' take:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/music_blog/2009/01/if-you-need-pro.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)