Soon-to-be-retired Congressman Barney Frank gave an interview to NEW YORK magazine. The edited version runs about nine pages. But here's a link to all fifteen pages of unfiltered Frank--with content sure to irritate both the Left and the Right:
http://nymag.com/news/features/barney-frank-full-transcript-2012-4/
Entries about current events, arts and entertainment (including the competitive sport of poetry).
Showing posts with label Newt Gingrich. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Newt Gingrich. Show all posts
Monday, April 16, 2012
Monday, January 30, 2012
New poem: NEWT NEWT
I'm reminded of a coach
who taught health class
in my high school.
>
He looked like a cross
between Peter Lorre
and Patton Oswalt.
>
And he never failed
to lecture the class
on "survival of the fittest."
>
There was a disconnect
between his public and private behavior.
But I didn't know it at the time.
>
Back then, gossip didn't spread too fast.
You had to stand still in a selected place
to use a telephone
>
and there was no texting
or personal computers
or any of the stuff that now
>
enables us to know hyperquick
about hypocrites, homilies and
counting on the public to swallow it whole
>
Be careful of how many bodies you bury
and all the skeletons you stack in storage.
There's always someone
>
who will take as much time as necessary
to bring petrified sin to the earth's surface
and hit the switch of a giant fan
>
so everyone can sample the putrid aroma.
who taught health class
in my high school.
>
He looked like a cross
between Peter Lorre
and Patton Oswalt.
>
And he never failed
to lecture the class
on "survival of the fittest."
>
There was a disconnect
between his public and private behavior.
But I didn't know it at the time.
>
Back then, gossip didn't spread too fast.
You had to stand still in a selected place
to use a telephone
>
and there was no texting
or personal computers
or any of the stuff that now
>
enables us to know hyperquick
about hypocrites, homilies and
counting on the public to swallow it whole
>
Be careful of how many bodies you bury
and all the skeletons you stack in storage.
There's always someone
>
who will take as much time as necessary
to bring petrified sin to the earth's surface
and hit the switch of a giant fan
>
so everyone can sample the putrid aroma.
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
New poem: SELF DEPORTATION
(thanks to Mitt for the title)
gonna leave the nation of hate
before it sends a 30-day notice
in the mail asking me
WHICH SIDE ARE YOU ON?
ARE YOU WITH US OR THEM?
>
to be honest,
I'm with THEM
because they see
stars and rainbows
and cats and dogs
and men and men
and women and women
and men and women
all living together
not caring about what US say
>
gonna leave the nation of conditional love
(which isn't real love at all)
before the demagnetizer
enters my brain
and erases memories
of all those times
I didn't have to guess
what other people felt and thought--
I just knew
and they knew
I cared
no matter what
>
you can reach me on the other side
anytime you want
I'll throw you a tin can
with a long string
over the fence
so we can listen to each other speak
and be certain that
no one else is listening
to us
but us alone
.
gonna leave the nation of hate
before it sends a 30-day notice
in the mail asking me
WHICH SIDE ARE YOU ON?
ARE YOU WITH US OR THEM?
>
to be honest,
I'm with THEM
because they see
stars and rainbows
and cats and dogs
and men and men
and women and women
and men and women
all living together
not caring about what US say
>
gonna leave the nation of conditional love
(which isn't real love at all)
before the demagnetizer
enters my brain
and erases memories
of all those times
I didn't have to guess
what other people felt and thought--
I just knew
and they knew
I cared
no matter what
>
you can reach me on the other side
anytime you want
I'll throw you a tin can
with a long string
over the fence
so we can listen to each other speak
and be certain that
no one else is listening
to us
but us alone
.
Sunday, January 22, 2012
Newt Gingrich: South Carolina gives an angry old man a further 15 minutes.
Probably the lowpoints of the political coverage I sat through last night:
1. On CNN, Erin Burnett trotted out her superfabulous CEO poll that showed that 11 out of 15 CEOs prefer Mitt Romney to Barack Obama.
2. On MSNBC, Chris Matthews was practically drooling over the Gingrich victory because it extends
the horserace (which Matthews seems to like covering more than the issues beneath it) a few more months.
As far as the Republican scrapfest of back-to-the-past ideological/economic titans is concerned, this primary cycle could climax in the GOP's first down-to-the-convention-floor nomination fight since the Gerald Ford vs. Ronald Reagan duel of 1976.
Let's leave Ron Paul and his scary no-government minimalism off the table. Consider the Big Three candidates carefully.
If you're not at least a millionaire (either through inheritance or actual work), Mitt Romney doesn't give a damn about you.
If you're not a heterosexual/literal-minded (aka Fundamentalist) Christian, Rick Santorum doesn't
give a darn about you.
And then there's Newt Gingrich, who, in essence, is every scowling, snarling, point-at-the-clock, fake-pious, never-ever-wrong boss (who keeps at least two sets of books) you've ever had the misfortune to work for.
Thanks to John King's Bernard Shaw-esque "gotcha" question (which should have been phrased as a more subtle query on the financial/sexual morality Gingrich asks of people that aren't named Newt Gingrich) and the angry voters of South Carolina (guessing a mix of anger/resentment/overdoses of Fox News/fierce dislike of being told to fall into line behind Mitt Romney), we're stuck with the frightening, monstrous blowhard behavior of ultimate nonwinner Newt into at least the late spring.
1. On CNN, Erin Burnett trotted out her superfabulous CEO poll that showed that 11 out of 15 CEOs prefer Mitt Romney to Barack Obama.
2. On MSNBC, Chris Matthews was practically drooling over the Gingrich victory because it extends
the horserace (which Matthews seems to like covering more than the issues beneath it) a few more months.
As far as the Republican scrapfest of back-to-the-past ideological/economic titans is concerned, this primary cycle could climax in the GOP's first down-to-the-convention-floor nomination fight since the Gerald Ford vs. Ronald Reagan duel of 1976.
Let's leave Ron Paul and his scary no-government minimalism off the table. Consider the Big Three candidates carefully.
If you're not at least a millionaire (either through inheritance or actual work), Mitt Romney doesn't give a damn about you.
If you're not a heterosexual/literal-minded (aka Fundamentalist) Christian, Rick Santorum doesn't
give a darn about you.
And then there's Newt Gingrich, who, in essence, is every scowling, snarling, point-at-the-clock, fake-pious, never-ever-wrong boss (who keeps at least two sets of books) you've ever had the misfortune to work for.
Thanks to John King's Bernard Shaw-esque "gotcha" question (which should have been phrased as a more subtle query on the financial/sexual morality Gingrich asks of people that aren't named Newt Gingrich) and the angry voters of South Carolina (guessing a mix of anger/resentment/overdoses of Fox News/fierce dislike of being told to fall into line behind Mitt Romney), we're stuck with the frightening, monstrous blowhard behavior of ultimate nonwinner Newt into at least the late spring.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)