http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/11/movies/jennifer-lawrence-in-silver-linings-playbook.html
Mainly a routine NEW YORK TIMES puff piece on Jennifer Lawrence focused on her role/performance in David O. Russell's possible mainstream hit THE SILVER LININGS PLAYBOOK.
But Ms. Lawrence's candor heads towards unapologetic ignorance in this passage:
“I like making movies, but that doesn’t mean I want to watch a black-and-white, freaking boring” — here she amped up the sarcasm with an unprintable word — “silent movie,” she said.
It's easy to say that her attitude is common to her generation--haven't seen too many, don't wanna see them, they're all boring. And she lives in a time where "old movies" tend to be the Rob Schneider vehicles she buys for her home library.
And it's probably useless to convince her that old "freaking boring" silent comedies such as Harold Lloyd's SAFETY LAST, Buster Keaton's BATTLING BUTLER and Charlie Chaplin's THE KID might have greater long-term value than say, Schneider's THE ANIMAL.
Plus it's a waste of time to say that late-period silent dramas such as BEGGARS OF LIFE, PANDORA'S BOX (the first two starring the never out-of-date Louise Brooks), UNDERWORLD and THE KISS have greater visual and dramatic sophistication than Ms. Lawrence's modestly entertaining (due to performances) but shaky-Cammed and timidly adapted THE HUNGER GAMES.
So, I know to keep my freaking mouth shut should I ever encounter Jennifer Lawrence in Los Angeles.
The battle for her cinematic soul has been won.
No comments:
Post a Comment