Showing posts with label Roger Ailes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Roger Ailes. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 5, 2018

ESQUIRE’s Charles P. Pierce on George H.W. Bush

Bush needed to shake up the [1988 presidential] race. To provide it, because the Bush family always hired out the dirty work rather than do it themselves because my dear young man, that simply is not done, Bush turned to a prominent political media guru named Roger Ailes and, between the two of them, they set up the situation in which, on live TV, while [CBS Evening News anchor Dan Rather] was pressing Bush on the latter’s involvement in the Iran-Contra scandal, Bush shoved back by citing an episode in which Rather, in a snit because a tennis match had run long, delaying his newscast, had walked off the air. Bush had dope-slapped Dan Rather. The Wimp Factor was dead. 

I recall watching that and thinking how contrived Bush’s anger was, how different it was from the genuine anger that he had flashed at that Boston anchorman eight years earlier. I thought it was cheap theatrics and, in retrospect, it sums up a great deal of George H.W. Bush’s political career—the pragmatic insincerity, the subcontracting of the hatchet job to a hired hand, the willingness to play a role, no matter how clumsily, in order to keep and maintain power. Oh, and as it happens, while he was play-acting the bad-ass, Bush also was lying his hindquarters off about Iran-Contra. He’d been hip-deep in that criminal conspiracy, as we subsequently learned in 1992, when he pardoned anyone who could tie that can to his tail on his way out of Washington. He always was a more interesting man than he always felt that he had to pretend to be.
...he could never muster enough political gumption to overcome his own ambition. And so, to me, that will be history’s verdict on George H.W. Bush—that he, as the late Richard Ben Cramer put it, did What It Takes to be president and never seemed to realize how brutal a price that was.

Wednesday, August 12, 2015

NEW YORK magazine's Frank Rich explains the continuing presence of Candidate Trump.

Alex Carp: The controversy following Donald Trump's comments about Megyn Kelly may have hurt him among some GOP insiders, but, according to post-debate polling, it hasn't cut into his popular appeal with Republican voters. Why not?
Frank Rich: The mystery of Trump’s hold on Republican voters is no mystery. As many, including me, have said, his xenophobia and misogyny have long been orthodoxy among the party’s base. Just look at the Fox News debate itself. Though Kelly called Trump out on his history of misogynistic insults, none of his nine opponents onstage took exception to his crude attack on Rosie O’Donnell or to the laughter and cheers it aroused from the audience. (The incident was an echo of that 2012 GOP debate where no one onstage dared chastise the audience for booing Stephen Hill, a gay serviceman in Iraq who asked the candidates a question about Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell via video.) Nor did anyone onstage dissent when Scott Walker and Marco Rubio declared that women should be outlawed from seeking abortions even if their own lives are at stake. How glibly and eagerly they decreed capital punishment for women who have the ill fortune to end up in tragic, potentially fatal pregnancies.
The difference between Trump and his cohort is that he shouts his party’s ugliest views at the top of his lungs and without apology rather than sugarcoating them in Frank Luntz–tested euphemisms and code words. What the GOP Establishment wants is Trumpism — and Trump supporters — without the embarrassing spectacle of Trump himself. Now he has called their bluff and is holding the entire Republican Party hostage. The Establishment would like to blow him up so that he’ll stop giving up the game by calling attention to the extremist views and constituents in the GOP base, but every attempt to sideline him has backfired. Trump, meanwhile, retains the power to blow up the party’s 2016 hopes by coaxing his followers either to stay home on Election Day or to join him in some quixotic third-party sideshow. As my colleague Gabriel Sherman has reported, even Roger Ailes has had to retreat and seek peace with Trump once Trump threatened to boycott Fox News and deprive it of ratings oxygen in the wake of his battle with Kelly. By bringing Ailes to heel, Trump has made himself the most powerful figure in the conservative firmament right now — more powerful than Ailes’s own boss, Rupert Murdoch.
Every day brings another op-ed or quote from a Republican functionary trying to find the bright side. Somehow Trump, in the end, will be good for the other candidates because he makes them look more presidential. Or he will fade when the calendar hits Labor Day, or will somehow self-destruct. These premature obituaries appeared after Trump mocked John McCain’s war service, after Trump supposedly did poorly in the debate, and after he literally attacked Kelly below the belt. Yet Trump’s numbers kept going up. Now William Kristol’s Weekly Standard is reduced to hawking a poll from Rasmussen Reports showing a falloff in Trump’s Republican support. That’s true desperation. Rasmussen is the notorious polling outfit that last gave Republicans false hopes in 2012, when it presaged a Romney victory by calling six of nine battleground states wrong.

Link to Rich's column (including discussions of Sen. Charles Schumer and Caitlyn Jenner):
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/08/why-are-donald-trumps-poll-numbers-still-high.html

Friday, June 10, 2011

New poem: WITHDRAWAL

I'm trying so hard to withdraw,
to untie the rubber tube
and wrench the syringe of cable news
from my veins.

Don't want to see the CNN Saturday anchor
smile every time she reads something 
off the prompter.

Don't want to see MSNBC hosts
named Lawrence and Ed
competing for who can get the most headlines
to fill the ratings void left 
when Keith Olbermann was unjustly fired.

Don't want to see Chris Matthews
saying things about Anthony Weiner
"sticking it out."

Don't want to see Anderson Cooper
being a puppet of his writers and producers.

Don't want to see Fox News
unless I'm in a doctor's waiting room
where I have no choice.
And, even then, I want a magazine
to keep me from being irradiated
by Republican talking points
and facts twisted like Silly Putty.

Don't want to watch HLN
and hear Nancy Grace
snarl about Lady Justice.
Or, for that matter, 
Doctor Drew and his endless quest
to present himself
as a sober-minded moralistic ambulance chaser.

I just want to tear out the needle
and the syringe
and throw them across the room

hearing the breaking glass of the syringe
and pronouncing myself
cured of propaganda and endless distraction
from the news that really matters.

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

When corporations run network news, corporations exempt themselves (and each other) from news coverage.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bill-maher/new-rule-not-everything-i_b_244050.html
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/08/01/ge/index.html
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/08/04/olbermann/index.html

Something interesting I read in the last link above. Glenn Greenwald links to David Sirota's article re the "Keith Olbermann told to stop criticizing Bill O'Reilly so Fox News can quit reporting on General Electric" mess. In the comments section of Sirota's piece, one gets the idea that some people are okay with Olbermann standing down in this matter as long as he has an opportunity to be a "progressive" voice on a cable news channel.

Question is: How progressive can you be if you work for a news organization that has no firewall between its operations and edicts from the corporation that owns it?

Friday, March 27, 2009

Fox News Channel's Glenn Beck and his six-foot wall.

http://gawker.com/5187225/paranoid-faux-populist-glenn-beck-walls-himself-off-from-humanity?skyline=true&s=x

Next, Bill O'Reilly--feeling hurt since Glenn Beck is apparently the new favorite blowhard of Roger Ailes--will likely build an eight-foot wall, plus add a few guards toting machine guns to keep nonfans and angry far-leftists away......

Friday, February 27, 2009